“There’s a distinct possibility that we may not
see an agreement before the end of this weekend,” the US official
said on condition of anonymity. “But talks are progressing and we do expect to
reach a deal in the near future.”
Earlier this week, as Pakistani President Asif
Ali Zardari accepted a last-minute Nato invitation to the May 20-21 summit,
many US officials were optimistic they could finally make a deal to reopen key
Nato ground routes into Afghanistan. Pakistan
shut the routes in protest when US
aircraft killed 24 Pakistani soldiers along the Afghan border in November.
Zardari’s appearance at the summit was seen as a
potential breakthrough after the border deaths plunged perennially poor
US-Pakistan ties into a deep freeze for months.
Now, as the two countries continue to disagree
about details of a possible deal, that optimism appears to have faded.
Nato nations, grappling with severe fiscal
pressure at home, are anxious to reach an agreement under which Pakistan would allow Nato trucks to once again
travel on Pakistani roads, in part because shipping supplies into land-locked Afghanistan
from the north is much more expensive.
Being able to transit across Pakistan becomes even more important as US commanders prepare for the monumental
logistical task of withdrawing most of the 128,000 Nato soldiers in Afghanistan –
and the equipment they have accumulated since 2001 – by the end of 2014.
Negotiations between US and Pakistani officials
in Islamabad
have dragged on.
From the beginning, Zardari’s government has
demanded a high-level apology for the border deaths, which Nato said were
accidental but which enraged Pakistanis.
The Obama administration, loathe exposing itself
to further Republican criticism, has refused to apologise.
The US
official said a “wide gulf” remained on the amount Nato nations would be
charged for transporting equipment into Afghanistan , the central stumbling
block in those talks.
“The fees proposed by the Pakistanis are
unacceptable, not just to the United
States but to our Nato allies,” the official
said.
Lack of an agreement could add strains to
interactions between President Barack Obama and other senior US officials
and Pakistani leaders during the summit. US
officials have long complained that Pakistan
has failed to act sufficiently against militants fighting US troops in Afghanistan .
The White House said on Thursday that Obama had
no plans for a one-on-one meeting with Zardari.
Still, Zardari’s government supports reopening
the supply routes once a deal can be reached that satisfies both sides. For
that reason the Obama administration expects to ultimately find an arrangement
on the supply routes and on the precise amount of US military assistance Washington owes Pakistan . (Reuters)